QUESTION 37
A business analyst (BA) works for an organization that is moving from a waterfall methodology to an agile approach. This causes new challenges and opportunities for the BA.
Which business analysis planning and monitoring element is most impacted by the organization’s change?
Explanation
The timing of business analysis work is the most impacted element by the organization’s change from a waterfall methodology to an agile approach. This is because the waterfall and agile methods have different ways of planning, executing, and delivering business analysis work.
In a waterfall method, the business analysis work is done in a sequential and linear manner, following predefined phases and milestones. The requirements are elicited, analyzed, and documented upfront, before the design and development stages. The changes to the requirements are minimized and controlled, and the deliverables are verified and validated at the end of the project. The timing of business analysis work is fixed and predictable, but it may also be rigid and inflexible.
In an agile method, the business analysis work is done in an iterative and incremental manner, following short cycles of development and feedback. The requirements are elicited, analyzed, and documented continuously, along with the design and development stages. The changes to the requirements are welcomed and managed, and the deliverables are verified and validated throughout the project. The timing of business analysis work is variable and adaptable, but it may also be challenging and uncertain.
Therefore, the business analyst (BA) needs to adjust the timing of business analysis work according to the agile method, which involves:
Breaking down the requirements into smaller and manageable chunks, called user stories or features, that can be delivered in each iteration or sprint Prioritizing and refining the requirements backlog, which is the list of all the requirements that need to be addressed in the project, based on the business value and stakeholder feedback Collaborating and communicating with the project team and stakeholders frequently and effectively, using various techniques and tools, such as daily stand-ups, retrospectives, demos, etc.
Adapting and responding to the changing requirements and business needs, using various techniques and tools, such as change requests, impact analysis, traceability, etc.
References:
[BABOK Guide v3], Section 2.4: Plan Business Analysis Work, p. 24-27
CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 2: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, p. 43-44 Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) Specialization, Course 1: Business Analysis:
Planning and Monitoring, Week 1: Introduction to Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, Video:
Waterfall vs. Agile
Agile vs. Waterfall | Pros, Cons, and Key Differences – ProductPlan
QUESTION 38
A national branch of a global company is struggling to improve business processes of its Public and Government Affairs (PGA) department. To work with external stakeholders effectively, PGA employees need to collect, manage, and exchange a vast amount of information. Complex cases involve collaboration of many employees from different departments. The ability to share information and to coordinate corresponding activities is crucial for the company’s growth plans. Their current tools and practices do not serve the purpose well. The existing system, which was deployed a couple of years ago, has only a few active users. The majority of PGA employees avoid using it because the system is hard to use and lacks needed functionality.
Consequently, available information is mostly unstructured and stored either locally or on a shared network drive. Some of the information exists only in a paper form.
The branch’s PGA head, who sponsors the project, wants to implement a configurable solution that two other branches successfully deployed several months ago. Both deployments were done by three solution consultants, who will be available to assist in the project. They will be responsible for tailoring the solution to PGA needs, as well as for training the PGA staff. With their help, the sponsor plans to complete the project in approximately three months.
The solution consultants reside in another country 7 hours ahead of the rest of the project team. They will be available part-time, but are planning two one-week long trips to the PGA central office to conduct initial training and to participate in the final deployment of the system into production. The consultants, in turn, expect a business analyst (BA) to assist in collecting necessary data and defining customization requirements.
What should define the timing of business analysis work in this project?
Explanation
The timing of business analysis work in this project should be defined by the overall project schedule, which is the plan that outlines the sequence and duration of project activities and tasks. The business analysis work should be aligned with the project schedule to ensure that the deliverables are completed on time and within the scope and budget of the project. The business analyst should also consider the dependencies, risks, and constraints that may affect the timing of business analysis work, such as the availability of stakeholders, the complexity of requirements, the quality of data, and the change management process. The business analyst should communicate and coordinate with the project manager and the solution consultants to ensure that the business analysis work is integrated with the project schedule and meets the expectations of the sponsor and the PGA staff.
References:
BABOK Guide v3, Section 3.2: Plan Business Analysis Approach, p. 48-49
CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 2: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, p. 51-52 Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) Specialization, Course 1: Business Analysis:
Planning and Communication, Week 2: Planning the Business Analysis Approach, Video: Planning the Business Analysis Work
QUESTION 51
A national branch of a global company is struggling to improve business processes of its Public and Government Affairs (PGA) department. To work with external stakeholders effectively, PGA employees need to collect, manage, and exchange a vast amount of information. Complex cases involve collaboration of many employees from different departments. The ability to share information and to coordinate corresponding activities is crucial for the company’s growth plans. Their current tools and practices do not serve the purpose well. The existing system, which was deployed a couple of years ago, has only a few active users. The majority of PGA employees avoid using it because the system is hard to use and lacks needed functionality.
Consequently, available information is mostly unstructured and stored either locally or on a shared network drive. Some of the information exists only in a paper form.
The branch’s PGA head, who sponsors the project, wants to implement a configurable solution that two other branches successfully deployed several months ago. Both deployments were done by three solution consultants, who will be available to assist in the project. They will be responsible for tailoring the solution to PGA needs, as well as for training the PGA staff. With their help, the sponsor plans to complete the project in approximately three months.
The solution consultants reside in another country 7 hours ahead of the rest of the project team. They will be available part-time, but are planning two one-week long trips to the PGA central office to conduct initial training and to participate in the final deployment of the system into production. The consultants, in turn, expect a business analyst (BA) to assist in collecting necessary data and defining customization requirements.
A BA suggests interviewing employees to elicit user requirements and then performing a gap analysis to identify solution customization requirements. However, the sponsor believes that it will be a waste of time because the employees do not know how the process should work in the future. The sponsor expects the solution to help shape their process and wants to start with the solution as is, amending it as necessary based on the user feedback.
What should the BA do?